Should
I test my employees in a tight labor market?
Good help is hard to find, especially when the labor market
is tight. So, why would you want to
make it harder to find workers by drug testing applicants?
And why would you want to risk losing your current employees by
testing them too?
Many companies ask this
question, and rightfully so. The answer, as we see it, is
to always test -- regardless of the job market. Here's
why: In a tight market, especially, you want to make sure
that you're getting the best employees that you can. The
employees that you have working for you can make all the
difference in the world.
What often happens is
that employees who use drugs will look for companies who do not
test. You won't find those people working at places that
do test. So by not testing, what kind of employees do you
end up with? Most likely, those who weren't able to secure
a job elsewhere. Do you want those types of employees
representing your business and interacting with your most
valued asset: your customer?
We believe the answer to
these questions is No! We feel that you would be
better served to add some other incentive to attract higher
quality employees away from other businesses such as higher
salaries, perks, discounts, or benefits. This way you end
up with higher quality employees rather than those employees
that have already been passed over by other businesses.
For
smaller businesses in particular, one serious accident or one
troubled employee can create major problems. The cost of
one employee's alcohol or other drug abuse can be devastating.
IHSN develops simple, effective drug testing programs that can
help even the smallest employer set up a drug testing program to
help protect themselves from the potential liabilities of not
having a program.
Go back
to IHSN's Drug Testing Essentials
|